10 Sep 2021


In the event of a background dispute, the transaction should normally be processed through a Tomlin contract, with the terms of the transaction appended to the order as a schedule. You only pay the claim or is there a counter-request to take into account a right of set-off or a possible claim? This is also relevant to the development of the release clause, which is explained below. Subsequently, it turned out that the share purchase agreement had never been concluded under Russian law. Subsequently, the former client filed a complaint against the lawyer for professional negligence. The lawyer claimed that the settlement agreement had settled all potential claims through professional negligence. The Court of Appeal agreed. A confidentiality clause is particularly common in the event of a dispute with professionals. As a general rule, this is formulated in such a way that it is possible to disclose the transaction to insurers, brokers, accountants/accountants, HMRC and any other carve-outs deemed necessary. In this case, a law firm entered into a settlement agreement with a former client following a fee dispute arising from work related to the acquisition of an oil exploration opportunity in Russia.

Part of this process was a share purchase agreement for the acquisition of a Russian company. Sometimes relations are so strained that the parties want to settle any claims or matters related to the relationship between them. In that case, the definition of the claim should, where appropriate, be extended. This is also an indication of the obvious, but check the amount of the billing. It`s true? Is there interest, legal fees and VAT? If so, say so. Similarly, individuals must be able to reach an agreement. This means that those under 18 and those who are unable to work due to illness or disability cannot enter into a binding agreement. Was the right defendant cited? If the claim is directed against a company, the good part is the party at the time of the plea. However, consider whether you should also mention the successor company or LLP to avoid doubt. Defendants and third parties may also need to be added if they participate in the agreement in a biased manner.

However, claims that are not legally known would not be excluded. In this context, a distinction is made between claims that are not legally known (which cannot be excluded) and those that the parties do not consider only arising (which can be excluded). . . .

Comments are closed.